Skillsive
Back to the comparison
Windows Mixed Reality (reference headsets)

Microsoft and OEM partners · 2017 · PC-powered VR

Windows Mixed Reality (reference headsets)

Eight OEM rebrands of one 2017 reference headset, ended not by their hardware but by Windows deleting the runtime.

DiscontinuedNot for our training
Resolution per eye
1440x1440
Refresh rate
60 / 90 Hz
Weight
—
Field of view
95°
Battery
—
Runs Skillsive apps
No

Windows Mixed Reality (reference headsets) — specification and verdict

Windows Mixed Reality was Microsoft's attempt to make PC VR a Windows feature: one reference design, shipped by Acer (AH101), Asus (HC102), Dell (Visor), Fujitsu (FMVHDS1), HP (VR1000), Lenovo (Explorer), Medion (Erazer X1000) and Samsung (HMD Odyssey). Most of them share the same foundation — 1440 x 1440 LCD per eye at 90 Hz, dropping to 60 Hz on minimum-specification PCs — with inside-out tracking that needed no sensors on the wall, which in 2017 was the platform's real advantage over the Vive and the Rift. Samsung's models were the exception, with AMOLED panels at 1440 x 1600. They get one record between them because the only fact that matters now applies to all of them equally: Windows 11 version 24H2 removed the runtime, so the hardware no longer runs at all — not in SteamVR, not anywhere.

There is nothing here to deploy. A Windows Mixed Reality headset on a current Windows install does not start at all, and the only machine that can still drive one is pinned to Windows 11 version 23H2, which Microsoft supports for this purpose only through November 2026. Holding a training PC on an unsupported Windows release to keep a 2017 headset alive is not a trade any IT department should accept. If a storeroom has a stack of these, they are e-waste rather than spare capacity — and the replacement is a standalone fleet, because our courses never ran on PC VR in the first place, so the migration loses nothing except the wall-mounted PCs.

Do not buy one at any price, and that includes the very tempting second-hand listings. This is the clearest case in the catalogue of hardware ended by software: the panels and the tracking still work, and the operating system does not. If what appealed was the setup-free inside-out tracking WMR pioneered, that idea survived in standalone headsets — look at the Quest 3 or the PICO 4 Ultra Enterprise instead.

How it compares within its class

The axis runs from the lowest to the highest published figure among the VR — PC-tethered devices in this catalogue. The grey tick is the median of that class.

Field of view95°
45°200°

Median for this class: 110°, from 39 models that publish the figure.

Controllers and hand tracking

Windows Mixed Reality motion controllers

Windows Mixed Reality motion controllers

6DoF

Microsoft's answer to base stations: the headset's own sensors watch the LED halo, and nothing goes on the walls. Two AA cells each, a touchpad and a thumbstick as separate inputs, and — the honest caveat — once it leaves the headset's view for long enough the system body-locks it to you and estimates where it is.

In the box

How it is tracked

Headset cameras

The headset watches markers on the controller, so it loses a hand held behind the back or low at the hip until it comes back into view.

Other controllers

Specific controllers from another maker

Windows Mixed Reality motion controllers (Acer, Dell, HP, Lenovo, Samsung, ASUS)

Bare hands

No hand tracking — a controller is the only way in.

Full specification

An em dash means the manufacturer does not publish that figure.

ManufacturerWho makes it — and who you buy support from.
Microsoft and OEM partners
CategoryWhich kind of product this is. It decides which rows below make sense at all.
VR — PC-tethered
Device typeWhere the computing happens, and therefore what you need to run it.
PC-powered VR
AnnouncedThe day it was shown, which is not the day it shipped.
Announced: not published by the manufacturer
ReleasedYear the model went on sale. Older is not automatically worse in this category.
2017
AvailabilityWhether you can still order it new today.
Discontinued
Support endsThe date the manufacturer stops supporting it. Decisive for a fleet you are about to buy.
2026-11-30

PanelThe screen type. micro-OLED gives deeper blacks and higher contrast; LCD is brighter and cheaper.
LCD
OpticsThe lenses in front of the panel. Pancake stays sharp closer to the edges than older Fresnel, which decides how much a trainee has to aim their head to read something.
Optics: not published by the manufacturer
Eyes coveredOne eye or both. Over a full shift this is a real difference in fatigue.
Both eyes
Resolution per eyePixels delivered to each eye. Higher means small text and labels stay readable.
≈1440x1440*Road to VR — Acer AH101 review
Refresh rateImages per second. Higher feels smoother and helps people prone to motion discomfort.
≈60/90 Hz*Road to VR — Acer AH101 review
Field of viewHow much of your view the image covers. Bigger is more immersive, not automatically better for work.
95° horizontal
Pixel densityPixels per degree of view — the honest way to compare sharpness between a headset and a pair of glasses. Higher is sharper. Only shown where somebody published it; we never compute it ourselves.
Pixel density: not published by the manufacturer
BrightnessIn a plant or outdoors, brightness decides legibility more than resolution does.
Brightness: not published by the manufacturer
WeightThe device alone. Anything above roughly 150 g is felt within an hour.
Weight: not published by the manufacturer

Who this device is for

This page is for whoever found a Dell Visor, Lenovo Explorer or Acer AH101 in a storeroom, or is looking at one in a classified ad, and needs to know whether it can be made to work. The answer is no, and learning that before buying a display adapter for it is the point of the page.

How it differs from its predecessor

The Samsung Odyssey+ has its own page here; this record is the rest of the family. The Odyssey+ brought an AMOLED panel with an anti-screen-door layer and Samsung's own audio, while the other rebrands were the same LCD reference design in different shells. Both share the fatal dependency: a Windows runtime that no longer exists.

What is missing, and what the manufacturer does not publish

Nobody publishes a single specification for this whole family, so the figures here describe the reference unit. Microsoft's own developer-kit announcement states a 95 degree horizontal field of view, and Acer's launch release repeats it. No weight is recorded, because a shell weight belongs to one OEM rather than to the family: Acer states 1.34 lbs for its own unit and Samsung's AMOLED model is heavier. IPD adjustment differed by OEM, with Samsung's models carrying a hardware slider while most of the rest were fixed, and no vendor published an IPD range. Nobody published a to-eye brightness figure, and the lens type is named only in Road to VR's review, never by Microsoft or the OEMs. No launch price is recorded either: Microsoft announced 299 dollars for the Acer developer kit without controllers and 329 for HP, while Acer's consumer bundle with the controllers this record counts as included cost 399.99. Microsoft gives the end of Steam support as a month, November 2026, and not as a date, so the support row here is the last day of that month. The resolution and refresh figures come from Road to VR's review of the Acer unit rather than from any manufacturer, and are marked as such.

Windows Mixed Reality (reference headsets) in independent reviews

Reviews we consider worth your time, each with a note on what the reviewer actually tested and why it matters for a training rollout. We do not own this hardware, so the tests are theirs — the reading of them is ours.

  • Tyriel Wood - VR Tech2018

    A full review written from the perspective of somebody already using a Vive and a Rift, which is the comparison that decided whether WMR was worth buying at the time. Pros and cons are separated rather than blended into a score.

    Watch on YouTube
  • The Verge2017

    The first look from IFA 2017, when the whole point of the platform was that several manufacturers would build to one Microsoft reference. Useful for understanding why these headsets are catalogued as one entry rather than six.

    Watch on YouTube
  • Nebbed2026

    Where the platform stands now that Microsoft has removed support, tested on hardware you can still find cheaply. If you are considering a second-hand WMR headset, this is the video that says what still runs.

    Watch on YouTube

Nothing is sent to YouTube until you press play. Once you do, Google receives your IP address and device data and may process them outside the EEA — see our privacy policy for the details.

Windows Mixed Reality (reference headsets) — frequently asked questions

Do Windows Mixed Reality headsets still work in 2026?
Only on a PC still running Windows 11 version 23H2. Microsoft removed Windows Mixed Reality in version 24H2, and after November 2026 even the 23H2 route stops receiving security updates, bug fixes and support. There is no way to run one of these on a current Windows install, and SteamVR cannot bring it back — the Steam support was itself a Windows component.
Which headsets were Windows Mixed Reality headsets?
Acer AH101, Asus HC102, Dell Visor, Fujitsu FMVHDS1, HP VR1000, Lenovo Explorer, Medion Erazer X1000 and Samsung HMD Odyssey, followed by the Samsung Odyssey+ and HP's Reverb line, which have their own pages here. All of them plugged into the same Windows runtime, which is why they stopped working together on one Windows update rather than one at a time.
Is a second-hand Dell Visor worth buying for VR training?
No. It costs almost nothing because it does almost nothing: the runtime it needs was deleted from Windows, and our Android-based training courses never ran on PC VR to begin with. One standalone headset does more for a training programme than a shelf of these, and it needs no PC per seat.

Compare this device

Consider these too

The nearest devices in the same class, ranked by availability and launch price — not by our opinion of them.

Specifications checked against the manufacturer's page on 2026-08-10. Manufacturer's specification

Product and company names used here are the trademarks of their respective owners and appear only to identify the hardware being compared. We are not affiliated with, sponsored by or endorsed by any of these manufacturers. Illustrations are our own.