Skillsive
Back to the comparison
RayNeo Air 2s

RayNeo · 2024 · Phone-powered AR

RayNeo Air 2s

A 2024 wearable display with four speakers and a 600-nit picture, now out of stock at RayNeo.

Discontinued
Display
Birdbath optics
Brightness
600 nits
Weight
78 g
Field of view
Battery
Runs Skillsive apps
No

RayNeo Air 2s — specification and verdict

The Air 2s sat in the middle of RayNeo's range and its own case rests on two things the spec sheet buries. It has four speakers in a push-push arrangement where the Air 2 has two, and its eye box is 11.2 by 6.5 millimetres against the Air 2's 10 by 6.5 - a small number that decides how much the picture shifts when the glasses move on your nose. Brightness to the eye is 600 nits from a 5000-nit panel with ten levels of control, and the whole thing weighs 78 grams. Everything else is the category norm: USB-C in, DisplayPort over that cable, no camera, no tracking, and a screen anchored in front of you rather than in the room.

Straightforward and short. It launched around 400 dollars and RayNeo's own store now shows 159 with the model out of stock, which puts it at the end of its life rather than in the middle. There is no device management, no kiosk mode and no enterprise tier - this is a consumer accessory. Prescription lenses are not included and not made by RayNeo; the box holds a sample frame and buyers order lenses separately. Certification is real and worth noting for anyone with an occupational-health reviewer: TUV Rheinland for low blue light, flicker-free and eye comfort, plus an EU declaration under Directive 2014/30.

Do not buy it for our courses - it is a screen on a cable, with no positional tracking and no way to run an Android VR build. As a personal display it was good value and is now clearance stock at RayNeo's own store, which means support and spares are finite. If the appeal is a big private screen from a phone or a handheld, the Air 3s and Air 3s Pro are the current models and are brighter; if the appeal is the four-speaker audio, this is the one in the family that has it.

How it compares within its class

The axis runs from the lowest to the highest published figure among the AR — wearable display devices in this catalogue. The grey tick is the median of that class.

Weight78 g
62 g130 g

Median for this class: 77 g, from 26 models that publish the figure.

Brightness600 nits
200 nits1600 nits

Median for this class: 700 nits, from 22 models that publish the figure.

Launch price$400
$299$2000

Median for this class: $500, from 19 models that publish the figure.

Controllers and hand tracking

Operated by Touchpad on the temple.

Bare hands

No hand tracking.

Full specification

An em dash means the manufacturer does not publish that figure.

ManufacturerWho makes it — and who you buy support from.
RayNeo
CategoryWhich kind of product this is. It decides which rows below make sense at all.
AR — wearable display
Device typeWhere the computing happens, and therefore what you need to run it.
Phone-powered AR
AnnouncedThe day it was shown, which is not the day it shipped.
Announced: not published by the manufacturer
ReleasedYear the model went on sale. Older is not automatically worse in this category.
2024
AvailabilityWhether you can still order it new today.
Discontinued
Support endsThe date the manufacturer stops supporting it. Decisive for a fleet you are about to buy.
Support ends: not published by the manufacturer

DisplayHow the image is produced. "No display" is a real answer in this category, not a gap.
Birdbath optics
Eyes coveredOne eye or both. Over a full shift this is a real difference in fatigue.
Eyes covered: not published by the manufacturer
Resolution per eyePixels delivered to each eye. Higher means small text and labels stay readable.
Resolution per eye: not published by the manufacturer
Refresh rateImages per second. Higher feels smoother and helps people prone to motion discomfort.
120 Hz
Field of viewHow much of your view the image covers. Bigger is more immersive, not automatically better for work.
Field of view: not published by the manufacturer
Pixel densityPixels per degree of view — the honest way to compare sharpness between a headset and a pair of glasses. Higher is sharper. Only shown where somebody published it; we never compute it ourselves.
Pixel density: not published by the manufacturer
BrightnessIn a plant or outdoors, brightness decides legibility more than resolution does.
600 nits
WeightThe device alone. Anything above roughly 150 g is felt within an hour.
78 g

Who this device is for

One person wanting a large private screen from a phone, a laptop or a handheld console, who cares about on-glasses audio more than about maximum brightness. Not for training: no tracking, no hands, nothing to run a scenario on.

What is missing, and what the manufacturer does not publish

No field of view and no per-eye resolution are recorded here, and the reason is worth reading before you find those numbers elsewhere. The 46-degree and 201-inch badge on this product page is byte-identical to the Air 3s and Air 3s Pro pages, and RayNeo's own ID-keyed comparison payload contradicts it: the 3s pair carry 47 degrees and the 46 belongs to the Air 2. The Air 2s has no row in that payload at all. The same applies to the 76-gram weight in the shared page grid, which is repeated for all four models - so we carry the 78 grams from RayNeo's earliest archived page for this specific model instead. Release date, chipset, battery and connectivity are simply unpublished.

RayNeo Air 2s in independent reviews

Reviews we consider worth your time, each with a note on what the reviewer actually tested and why it matters for a training rollout. We do not own this hardware, so the tests are theirs — the reading of them is ours.

  • CNET2024

    A mainstream review that treats them as a consumer product rather than an enthusiast one, which suits a device whose case rests on comfort and audio rather than on a headline number.

    Watch on YouTube
  • Bobby Tonelli2024

    Frames the review as hype against reality, and that framing is the useful part in a category where the marketing numbers travel further than the products. Watch for what the reviewer stopped using after a week.

    Watch on YouTube
  • Spencer Scott Pugh2024

    A third independent voice with a contrarian title, which is what a record needs when the other two broadly agree. Useful specifically on the four-speaker audio, which is this model's one real differentiator against the Air 2.

    Watch on YouTube

Nothing is sent to YouTube until you press play. Once you do, Google receives your IP address and device data and may process them outside the EEA — see our privacy policy for the details.

RayNeo Air 2s — frequently asked questions

Why does this page not list a field of view for the RayNeo Air 2s?
Because RayNeo publishes a figure we can prove is not the Air 2s's. The 46-degree badge on its product page is byte-identical to the badge on the Air 3s and Air 3s Pro pages, and RayNeo's own comparison data, which is keyed by model ID, gives 47 degrees to the 3s pair and 46 to the Air 2. The Air 2s has no row in that data. Rather than print a number that belongs to a sibling, we leave the cell empty and tell you why.
What does the Air 2s have that the Air 2 does not?
Two things RayNeo documents in a genuine two-column table of its own: four speakers instead of two, in a push-push arrangement, and a larger eye box at 11.2 by 6.5 millimetres against 10 by 6.5. The eye box is the one worth caring about - it is how much room your pupil has before the image starts to dim at the edges, which in practice decides how often you push the glasses back up your nose. Display distortion is also lower, at 1.0 percent against 1.2.

Compare this device

Consider these too

The nearest devices in the same class, ranked by availability and launch price — not by our opinion of them.

Specifications checked against the manufacturer's page on 2026-08-17. Manufacturer's specification

Product and company names used here are the trademarks of their respective owners and appear only to identify the hardware being compared. We are not affiliated with, sponsored by or endorsed by any of these manufacturers. Illustrations are our own.