Skillsive
Back to the comparison
VITURE Pro 2

VITURE · 2026 · Phone-powered AR

VITURE Pro 2

The cheapest one has the newest optics — and the brightest panel VITURE makes.

Display
Birdbath optics
Brightness
1600 nits
Weight
63 g
Field of view
50°
Battery
Runs Skillsive apps
No

VITURE Pro 2 — specification and verdict

Pro 2 is an inversion of the usual order: at 299 dollars it is the cheapest thing VITURE sells and also the one the company says has its best optics, a birdbath generation it calls UltraClarity 3.0, plus the brightest panel in the range at 1600 nits. At 63 grams it is the lightest too. What it gives up is resolution — 1080p per eye where the Luma models are 1200p, a trade VITURE never acknowledges in any of its own comparisons — and the electrochromic film: instead of tinting lenses it ships a physical lens shade you clip on. Twin dials cover 0 to −5.0 dioptres independently per eye. Desktop SpaceWalker is still listed as coming soon for it.

The same answer as the rest of the line — a display with nothing to deploy onto it — with one practical difference: desktop SpaceWalker is still listed as coming soon for this model, so on a laptop it is a plain external monitor today. Its arguments for shared or occasional use are weight and fit: 63 grams, three nose pads across seven height settings, and dioptre dials that let most short-sighted people use it without inserts at all.

The best value in VITURE’s range on the company’s own account — it says outright that Pro 2’s optics generation is newer and sharper than the pricier Luma’s, and it is both the lightest and the brightest thing VITURE sells. The trade it never mentions is resolution: 1080p per eye against 1200p on the Luma models. Two smaller things to know. It has no electrochromic film; immersion comes from a physical shade in the box. And unlike both its siblings, VITURE publishes no power statement for it at all — not even the "no built-in battery" line the Luma pages carry — so we have recorded nothing rather than assume.

How it compares within its class

The axis runs from the lowest to the highest published figure among the AR — wearable display devices in this catalogue. The grey tick is the median of that class.

Field of view50°
34°58°

Median for this class: 50°, from 19 models that publish the figure.

Weight63 g
62 g130 g

Median for this class: 77 g, from 22 models that publish the figure.

Brightness1600 nits
200 nits1600 nits

Median for this class: 700 nits, from 20 models that publish the figure.

Launch price$299
$299$2000

Median for this class: $514, from 16 models that publish the figure.

Full specification

An em dash means the manufacturer does not publish that figure.

ManufacturerWho makes it — and who you buy support from.
VITURE
CategoryWhich kind of product this is. It decides which rows below make sense at all.
AR — wearable display
Device typeWhere the computing happens, and therefore what you need to run it.
Phone-powered AR
AnnouncedThe day it was shown, which is not the day it shipped.
2026-08-05
ReleasedYear the model went on sale. Older is not automatically worse in this category.
2026
AvailabilityWhether you can still order it new today.
On sale
Support endsThe date the manufacturer stops supporting it. Decisive for a fleet you are about to buy.
Support ends: not published by the manufacturer

DisplayHow the image is produced. "No display" is a real answer in this category, not a gap.
Birdbath optics
Eyes coveredOne eye or both. Over a full shift this is a real difference in fatigue.
Both eyes
Resolution per eyePixels delivered to each eye. Higher means small text and labels stay readable.
1920x1080
Refresh rateImages per second. Higher feels smoother and helps people prone to motion discomfort.
120 Hz
Field of viewHow much of your view the image covers. Bigger is more immersive, not automatically better for work.
50°
Pixel densityPixels per degree of view — the honest way to compare sharpness between a headset and a pair of glasses. Higher is sharper. Only shown where somebody published it; we never compute it ourselves.
Pixel density: not published by the manufacturer
BrightnessIn a plant or outdoors, brightness decides legibility more than resolution does.
1600 nits
WeightThe device alone. Anything above roughly 150 g is felt within an hour.
63 g

Who this device is for

VITURE aims it at first-time buyers and travel: "If you want the sharpest optics at the most accessible price, the thinnest XR glasses ever, and the ideal first pair for gaming and everyday use, choose VITURE Pro 2", and the FAQ frames it as "designed for everyday XR entertainment ... for movies, travel, and casual gaming". At 63 grams it is the lightest thing the company sells.

How it differs from its predecessor

Against every other VITURE it is the cheapest, lightest and brightest, and the company says it also has the newest and sharpest optics. Against the Luma it costs a hundred dollars less and gives up 1200p for 1080p and the electrochromic film for a clip-on shade. Against the Luma Ultra there is no comparison of capability — no cameras, no 6DoF — only of price and weight. Against the XREAL xbx a01+, the closest thing in this catalogue at the same 299 dollars, the a01+ is brighter still and lighter, but Pro 2 has dioptre dials where the a01+ has none.

What is missing, and what the manufacturer does not publish

The published folded dimensions are 50 by 50 by 54.3 millimetres, which cannot be right for glasses whose own case is 191 millimetres long — VITURE repeats the same figure in German, so it is a consistent publication rather than a locale typo, and we have recorded nothing. There is no power statement of any kind for this model, not even the "no built-in battery" line both Luma pages carry. The 146-inch screen claim comes with no viewing distance, where both Luma models qualify theirs at four metres. The prescription story contradicts itself: the FAQ refers to "the included clip-in prescription lens frame" while the box contents list none and VITURE sells it separately. The step down from 1200p to 1080p is never acknowledged in any VITURE comparison. And there is no microphone claim, no frame material, no field-of-view axis and no regulatory marking.

VITURE Pro 2 — frequently asked questions

How does the cheapest model end up with the best optics?
It is the newest. VITURE calls the birdbath generation in it UltraClarity 3.0 and answers the comparison directly: asked which is sharper between Pro 2 and the pricier Luma, it says Pro 2. The saving comes from elsewhere — 1080p per eye instead of 1200p, no electrochromic film, and no size options.
How does it block outside light without electrochromic lenses?
With a physical shade you clip on. VITURE ships one in the box — "snap it on for full immersion, snap it off to stay present" — where the Luma models darken the lenses electrically at a tap. The trade is practical rather than technical: the shade is a part you can lose, and it is all or nothing, but it costs nothing in weight or price.

Compare this device

Consider these too

The nearest devices in the same class, ranked by availability and launch price — not by our opinion of them.

Specifications checked against the manufacturer's page on 2026-08-16. Manufacturer's specification

Product and company names used here are the trademarks of their respective owners and appear only to identify the hardware being compared. We are not affiliated with, sponsored by or endorsed by any of these manufacturers. Illustrations are our own.