Skillsive
Back to the comparison
Varjo VR-2 Pro

Varjo · 2019 · PC-powered VR

Varjo VR-2 Pro

The VR-2 with Ultraleap hand tracking, a counterweight and a subscription 200 euro a year higher.

DiscontinuedNot for our training
Resolution per eye
1440x1600
Refresh rate
60 / 90 Hz
Weight
Field of view
87°
Battery
Runs Skillsive apps
No

Varjo VR-2 Pro — specification and verdict

The Pro is the VR-2 with the one omission put back. Where the base model has no hand tracking at all, the Pro carries an integrated Ultraleap sensor - two wide-angle infrared cameras and their LEDs - so a trainee can reach for something without a controller in hand. The rest follows from that: a 250 gram counterweight to balance the extra hardware, a 10 metre optical cable instead of five, and a thousand dollars more on the price. The bionic display, the automatic IPD, the 100 Hz eye tracking and the SteamVR base-station dependency are identical to the VR-2, which is why the two records look so alike and why copying figures between them is the standard mistake.

The subscription is higher here and it is not optional: Varjo attached a Software and Support service of 995 euro a year to every VR-2 Pro, minimum one year, worded as added to the price of all purchases. That puts real entry at roughly 6,990 euro per seat before base stations and controllers, neither of which is in the box - Varjo recommends four base stations for room-scale work. Lead time was longer than the base model at six to eight weeks, and shipping covered 35 countries for business use only. Support has since stopped moving: Varjo Base 3.7.2 is the last release it recommends for this generation, with no dated end-of-life notice.

Historical, like the base VR-2 - a SteamVR headset our Android courses never ran on. Where the Pro is genuinely more interesting is that it is the earliest device in this catalogue combining human-eye-resolution optics with controller-free hand input, which is the combination a hands-on training scenario actually wants. It arrived at 5,995 dollars plus a 995 euro annual fee and needed base stations, so it answered the question at a price nobody could scale. If that combination is what you need today, look at the XR-4 line.

How it compares within its class

The axis runs from the lowest to the highest published figure among the VR — PC-tethered devices in this catalogue. The grey tick is the median of that class.

Field of view87°
45°200°

Median for this class: 110°, from 39 models that publish the figure.

Launch price$5995
$398$38500

Median for this class: $899, from 45 models that publish the figure.

Controllers and hand tracking

Illustration pending

Controller

6DoF

Sold separately

How it is tracked

Base stations (Lighthouse)

Base stations sweep the room with lasers. Coverage comes from where the boxes are mounted rather than from what the headset can see — occlusion stops being a problem, and the boxes are a second purchase.

Other controllers

Any SteamVR (Lighthouse) controller

Index Controller · HTC Vive controller

Bare hands

Full hand skeleton

The application receives a jointed hand pose, so a scenario can check what the fingers are doing and draw the hand as it moves.

Hand tracking SDK: Ultraleap

Full specification

An em dash means the manufacturer does not publish that figure.

ManufacturerWho makes it — and who you buy support from.
Varjo
CategoryWhich kind of product this is. It decides which rows below make sense at all.
VR — PC-tethered
Device typeWhere the computing happens, and therefore what you need to run it.
PC-powered VR
AnnouncedThe day it was shown, which is not the day it shipped.
2019-10-15
ReleasedYear the model went on sale. Older is not automatically worse in this category.
2019
AvailabilityWhether you can still order it new today.
Discontinued
Support endsThe date the manufacturer stops supporting it. Decisive for a fleet you are about to buy.
Support ends: not published by the manufacturer

PanelThe screen type. micro-OLED gives deeper blacks and higher contrast; LCD is brighter and cheaper.
OLED
OpticsThe lenses in front of the panel. Pancake stays sharp closer to the edges than older Fresnel, which decides how much a trainee has to aim their head to read something.
Optics: not published by the manufacturer
Eyes coveredOne eye or both. Over a full shift this is a real difference in fatigue.
Both eyes
Resolution per eyePixels delivered to each eye. Higher means small text and labels stay readable.
1440x1600
Refresh rateImages per second. Higher feels smoother and helps people prone to motion discomfort.
60/90 Hz
Field of viewHow much of your view the image covers. Bigger is more immersive, not automatically better for work.
87°
Pixel densityPixels per degree of view — the honest way to compare sharpness between a headset and a pair of glasses. Higher is sharper. Only shown where somebody published it; we never compute it ourselves.
Pixel density: not published by the manufacturer
BrightnessIn a plant or outdoors, brightness decides legibility more than resolution does.
Brightness: not published by the manufacturer
WeightThe device alone. Anything above roughly 150 g is felt within an hour.
Weight: not published by the manufacturer

Who this device is for

The same simulation and design-review teams as the VR-2, plus anyone whose scenario needed bare hands rather than controllers. Today only relevant to owners deciding whether to keep a unit running, and to anyone tracing when hand tracking first met high-resolution optics.

What is missing, and what the manufacturer does not publish

Varjo published no dimensions, no IPD range in millimetres and no microphone for this model either, in the product pages, the Quick Guide or the Safety PDF. There is no dated end-of-support notice - only a recommendation to stay on Varjo Base 3.7.2 - because Varjo issued dated end-of-life only for the Gen 3 line, which does not carry over. One oddity worth recording: Varjo's own safety documents give the VR-2 Pro the same FCC ID as the base VR-2, 2AROD-001, despite the extra hand-tracking hardware. That is what the maker published, so that is what we carry.

Varjo VR-2 Pro — frequently asked questions

What exactly separates the Varjo VR-2 Pro from the VR-2?
Four things, and Varjo lists all four. Integrated Ultraleap hand tracking, which the base VR-2 does not have at all. A 250 gram counterweight, so the strapped weight is 855 grams against 605 for the headset alone. A ten metre optical cable instead of five. And a thousand dollars on the price, 5,995 against 4,995, plus a subscription 200 euro a year higher. The displays, optics, eye tracking and IPD mechanism are identical, which is why so many sources mix the two up.
Was the Varjo subscription really compulsory?
Yes, and Varjo said so on the product page rather than in the small print: the Software and Support service will be added to the price of all VR-2 Pro purchases, at 995 euro, offered for a minimum of one year. It was not a support option you could decline. For a buyer that means the sticker price understates the first year by a fifth, and it is the single most useful thing to know about this generation that no aggregator carries.

Compare this device

Consider these too

The nearest devices in the same class, ranked by availability and launch price — not by our opinion of them.

Specifications checked against the manufacturer's page on 2026-08-17. Manufacturer's specification

Product and company names used here are the trademarks of their respective owners and appear only to identify the hardware being compared. We are not affiliated with, sponsored by or endorsed by any of these manufacturers. Illustrations are our own.