Free tool
Meta Quest 3 vs PICO 4 Ultra
Both devices below are described from their manufacturers’ own specification pages. Where a row does not apply to one of them, it says so rather than showing a dash — that is a different statement from “the maker does not publish it”.
What actually differs
Computed from the two records, most decisive first.
Launch price
- Meta Quest 3
- $499
- PICO 4 Ultra
- $649
Resolution per eye
- Meta Quest 3
- 2064x2208
- PICO 4 Ultra
- 2160x2160
Field of view
- Meta Quest 3
- 110° horizontal
- PICO 4 Ultra
- 105° horizontal
Refresh rate
- Meta Quest 3
- 72/90/120 Hz
- PICO 4 Ultra
- 90 Hz
Weight
- Meta Quest 3
- 515 g
- PICO 4 Ultra
- 580 g
Battery
- Meta Quest 3
- 132 min
- PICO 4 Ultra
- —
Manufacturer
- Meta Quest 3
- Meta
- PICO 4 Ultra
- PICO (ByteDance)
Released
- Meta Quest 3
- 2023
- PICO 4 Ultra
- 2024
Memory
- Meta Quest 3
- 8 GB
- PICO 4 Ultra
- 12 GB
Platform
- Meta Quest 3
- Meta Horizon OS
- PICO 4 Ultra
- PICO OS
Storage
- Meta Quest 3
- 512 GB
- PICO 4 Ultra
- 256 GB
IPD adjustment
- Meta Quest 3
- Manual
- PICO 4 Ultra
- —
They match on 21 further specifications.
Full specification, row by row
| Specification |  Meta Quest 3 Meta |  PICO 4 Ultra PICO (ByteDance) |
|---|---|---|
| ManufacturerWho makes it — and who you buy support from. | Meta | PICO (ByteDance) |
| CategoryWhich kind of product this is. It decides which rows below make sense at all. | VR — standalone | VR — standalone |
| Device typeWhere the computing happens, and therefore what you need to run it. | Standalone VR, also PC-powered | Standalone VR, also PC-powered |
| ReleasedYear the model went on sale. Older is not automatically worse in this category. | 2023 | 2024 |
| AvailabilityWhether you can still order it new today. | On sale | On sale |
| Support endsThe date the manufacturer stops supporting it. Decisive for a fleet you are about to buy. | Support ends: not published by the manufacturer | Support ends: not published by the manufacturer |
| Runs Skillsive appsOur own statement about whether Skillsive training applications run on it today. | Yes | Yes |
| Suitable for trainingOur judgement on whether it survives real deployment: comfort, hygiene, fleet management. | Yes | Yes |
| Kiosk mode / MDMVendor tooling to enrol devices, push an app and lock the headset to it. Practically required above ten devices. | No | No |
| Business tierAn official business tier, so devices belong to the company rather than to employees’ personal accounts. | No | No |
| Swappable facial interfaceRemovable, wipeable face padding. A consumable, and the difference between shared use and complaints. | Yes | Yes |
| CertificationsIndustrial certifications stated on the manufacturer's own page. Empty means unconfirmed, never "probably fine". | Certifications: not published by the manufacturer | Certifications: not published by the manufacturer |
| PerformanceHow much the headset can run — sharper scenes, more objects, smoother mixed reality. Higher is better. | Very good | Very good |
| ProcessorThe processor and memory inside. This is what the performance grade above is derived from. | Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 | Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 |
| MemoryRAM on the device. Together with the chipset it sets how complex a scene can be. | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| PlatformThe platform an application is built against — and what an MDM has to speak. | Meta Horizon OS | PICO OS |
| StorageOn-board space for downloaded courses. More matters for an offline library in several languages. | 512 GB | 256 GB |
| BatteryRuntime as the manufacturer states it. A hot-swappable pack matters more than the figure. | 132 min | Battery: not published by the manufacturer |
| Hot-swap batteryWhether a charged battery can replace the empty one without ending the session. This is what decides if a headset can hold an all-day training station. | No | No |
| PanelThe screen type. micro-OLED gives deeper blacks and higher contrast; LCD is brighter and cheaper. | LCD | LCD |
| OpticsThe lenses in front of the panel. Pancake stays sharp closer to the edges than older Fresnel, which decides how much a trainee has to aim their head to read something. | Pancake lenses | Pancake lenses |
| Eyes coveredOne eye or both. Over a full shift this is a real difference in fatigue. | Eyes covered: not published by the manufacturer | Eyes covered: not published by the manufacturer |
| Resolution per eyePixels delivered to each eye. Higher means small text and labels stay readable. | 2064x2208 | 2160x2160 |
| Refresh rateImages per second. Higher feels smoother and helps people prone to motion discomfort. | 72/90/120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Field of viewHow much of your view the image covers. Bigger is more immersive, not automatically better for work. | 110° horizontal | 105° horizontal |
| Pixel densityPixels per degree of view — the honest way to compare sharpness between a headset and a pair of glasses. Higher is sharper. Only shown where somebody published it; we never compute it ourselves. | Pixel density: not published by the manufacturer | Pixel density: not published by the manufacturer |
| BrightnessIn a plant or outdoors, brightness decides legibility more than resolution does. | Brightness: not published by the manufacturer | Brightness: not published by the manufacturer |
| WeightThe device alone. Anything above roughly 150 g is felt within an hour. | 515 g | 580 g |
| TrackingWhether content stays put in the room (6DoF), follows head rotation (3DoF) or is simply fixed. | inside-out 6DoF | inside-out 6DoF |
| Hand trackingWhether bare hands can operate the interface, without a controller or the phone. | Yes | Yes |
| Eye trackingThe headset knows where the trainee is looking. Enables sharper rendering where they look, and attention analytics. | No | No |
| Controllers includedWhether motion controllers come in the box, or are bought separately — or the device is hands-only. | Yes | Yes |
| Controller tracking6DoF controllers track position and rotation, so a hand reaches in space; 3DoF only point. “None” means hands only. | 6DoF | 6DoF |
| IPD adjustmentMatching lens spacing to the eyes. Motorised is fastest when one headset passes between people. | Manual | IPD adjustment: not published by the manufacturer |
| IPD rangeHow far the lenses travel to match eye spacing. A narrow range excludes part of any group of adults, which matters when one headset is shared. | 53–75 mm | 58–72 mm |
| Works with glassesWhether people who wear glasses can use it — fits over them, or takes prescription lens inserts. | Yes | Yes |
| Colour passthroughShows the real room in colour through the cameras — the prerequisite for any mixed-reality exercise. | Yes | Yes |
| ConnectivityHow it connects to a phone, a PC or a network. | Connectivity: not published by the manufacturer | Connectivity: not published by the manufacturer |
| AudioBuilt-in sound. Matters most where somebody has to hear a remote expert while working. | Audio: not published by the manufacturer | Audio: not published by the manufacturer |
| MicrophoneBuilt-in microphone — the other half of talking to a remote expert. | Microphone: not published by the manufacturer | Microphone: not published by the manufacturer |
| Price bandThe band it sits in, rather than a price that goes stale. | Mid range | Mid range |
| Launch priceThe manufacturer's launch price. Fixed history, so it never goes stale. | $499 | $649 |
| Price todayApproximate current net price in USD — a general figure, since these barely differ between regions once tax is stripped out. A snapshot from the date shown, not an offer. | $499 | Price today: not published by the manufacturer |
| Comfort (from reviews)How it wears over a full session. Scored from agreement between independent reviewers, not from our own testing. | 3 / 5models.quest-3.ratingNotes.comfortRoad to VR review,UploadVR review | Comfort (from reviews): not published by the manufacturer |
| Edge clarity (from reviews)Sharpness away from the centre of the lens. Scored from agreement between independent reviewers. | Edge clarity (from reviews): not published by the manufacturer | Edge clarity (from reviews): not published by the manufacturer |
| Tracking reliability (from reviews)How tracking holds up in poor light and fast movement. Scored from agreement between independent reviewers. | Tracking reliability (from reviews): not published by the manufacturer | Tracking reliability (from reviews): not published by the manufacturer |
| Hand tracking quality (from reviews)How usable controller-free hand tracking is in a training scenario. Scored from agreement between reviewers. | 4 / 5models.quest-3.ratingNotes.handTrackingUploadVR, Quest 3 vs PSVR2 hand tracking,Road to VR, hand-tracking upgrade | Hand tracking quality (from reviews): not published by the manufacturer |
“—” means the manufacturer does not publish that figure. “≈” with an asterisk means it was measured by somebody else — follow the asterisk for who. Prices are an indicative net figure in USD, a snapshot from the date on each model page, not an offer.
Other comparisons with Meta Quest 3
Product and company names used here are the trademarks of their respective owners and appear only to identify the hardware being compared. We are not affiliated with, sponsored by or endorsed by any of these manufacturers. Illustrations are our own.