Skillsive
Back to the comparison
Rokid Max 2

Rokid · 2024 · Phone-powered AR

Rokid Max 2

A 75 g wearable display with a dioptre dial — and 3DoF only inside Rokid's own software.

Display
Birdbath optics
Brightness
600 nits
Weight
75 g
Field of view
50°
Battery
Runs Skillsive apps
No

Rokid Max 2 — specification and verdict

The Max 2 weighs 75 g, at the light end of this class, with 1920×1080 micro-OLED per eye, 50°, up to 600 nits, and a dioptre dial from 0.00D to −6.00D that covers most short-sightedness without inserts. Plugged into a laptop or console it is a straightforward mirrored screen.

The 3DoF anchoring appears only inside Rokid's own software — its belt-worn puck or its phone application — so on a plain USB-C source the screen simply follows your head. Nothing installs on the glasses, and any Android application would live on the puck or the phone.

A good, light second screen; not a work device.

How it compares within its class

The axis runs from the lowest to the highest published figure among the AR — wearable display devices in this catalogue. The grey tick is the median of that class.

Field of view50°
34°58°

Median for this class: 50°, from 19 models that publish the figure.

Weight75 g
62 g130 g

Median for this class: 77 g, from 22 models that publish the figure.

Brightness600 nits
200 nits1600 nits

Median for this class: 700 nits, from 20 models that publish the figure.

Launch price$529
$299$2000

Median for this class: $514, from 16 models that publish the figure.

Full specification

An em dash means the manufacturer does not publish that figure.

ManufacturerWho makes it — and who you buy support from.
Rokid
CategoryWhich kind of product this is. It decides which rows below make sense at all.
AR — wearable display
Device typeWhere the computing happens, and therefore what you need to run it.
Phone-powered AR
AnnouncedThe day it was shown, which is not the day it shipped.
Announced: not published by the manufacturer
ReleasedYear the model went on sale. Older is not automatically worse in this category.
2024
AvailabilityWhether you can still order it new today.
On sale
Support endsThe date the manufacturer stops supporting it. Decisive for a fleet you are about to buy.
Support ends: not published by the manufacturer

DisplayHow the image is produced. "No display" is a real answer in this category, not a gap.
Birdbath optics
Eyes coveredOne eye or both. Over a full shift this is a real difference in fatigue.
Both eyes
Resolution per eyePixels delivered to each eye. Higher means small text and labels stay readable.
1920x1200
Refresh rateImages per second. Higher feels smoother and helps people prone to motion discomfort.
60/90/120 Hz
Field of viewHow much of your view the image covers. Bigger is more immersive, not automatically better for work.
50°
Pixel densityPixels per degree of view — the honest way to compare sharpness between a headset and a pair of glasses. Higher is sharper. Only shown where somebody published it; we never compute it ourselves.
Pixel density: not published by the manufacturer
BrightnessIn a plant or outdoors, brightness decides legibility more than resolution does.
600 nits
WeightThe device alone. Anything above roughly 150 g is felt within an hour.
75 g

Who this device is for

The Rokid Max 2 is a 75 g pair of display glasses aimed at travel and personal viewing: 50 degrees, 600 nits and a diopter adjustment that lets many short-sighted users wear them without inserts. It suits video and a portable second screen; it runs no application of its own and our courses do not run on it.

How it differs from its predecessor

Against the XREAL One it is comparable in field of view and lighter, and it lacks an anchoring chip, so screen stability depends on what it is plugged into. Against the Rokid AR Spatial, the Max 2 is the display half of that package — the Spatial adds the Station puck and Android on top.

What is missing, and what the manufacturer does not publish

No camera, no on-board platform, no device management and no support for our applications. At 600 nits it is on the dim side of this class for outdoor use. Rokid does publish the display figures — 1920x1200 per eye at 60 to 120 Hz — but the glasses default to 1920x1080 until you raise it in settings, and 3DoF still means the image follows your head unless host software says otherwise.

Rokid Max 2 in independent reviews

Reviews we consider worth your time, each with a note on what the reviewer actually tested and why it matters for a training rollout. We do not own this hardware, so the tests are theirs — the reading of them is ours.

  • WhatGear2024

    Covers the glasses together with the Rokid Station, which is how most people actually use them — the glasses alone are a display, and the Station is what turns the pair into something self-contained.

    Watch on YouTube
  • Golf Sky2026

    Daily use over time rather than a first impression, and specific about the things that decide whether these stay in the bag: text clarity, micro-OLED quality and how quickly they drain the device driving them.

    Watch on YouTube

Nothing is sent to YouTube until you press play. Once you do, Google receives your IP address and device data and may process them outside the EEA — see our privacy policy for the details.

Rokid Max 2 — frequently asked questions

Do Rokid Max 2 glasses work for people who wear glasses?
Often yes without inserts: the Max 2 has a built-in dioptre adjustment for short-sightedness, which is unusual in this class and removes a per-person purchase. Astigmatism still needs a prescription insert, as it does on every pair of display glasses here.
What is the Rokid Station and do I need one?
A small Android box that plugs into the glasses so they work without a phone or laptop — which is the difference between a display and a self-contained device. You do not need one if you always have a USB-C phone with DisplayPort output, and you do if you want the glasses to be the whole setup.

Compare this device

Consider these too

The nearest devices in the same class, ranked by availability and launch price — not by our opinion of them.

Specifications checked against the manufacturer's page on 2026-08-04. Manufacturer's specification

Product and company names used here are the trademarks of their respective owners and appear only to identify the hardware being compared. We are not affiliated with, sponsored by or endorsed by any of these manufacturers. Illustrations are our own.