Skillsive
Back to the comparison
Epson Moverio BT-350

Epson · 2017 · Standalone AR

Epson Moverio BT-350

The BT-300 rebuilt for a queue of strangers: extendable temples, IPX-2 and fleet management software.

Discontinued
Display
Waveguide
Brightness
Weight
119 g
Field of view
23°
Battery
360 min
Runs Skillsive apps
No

Epson Moverio BT-350 — specification and verdict

Epson says outright that the BT-350 carries all the internal specifications and key features of the BT-300, so the interesting part is everything outside the electronics. The temples extend and the nose pads adjust, because this was built for a museum or a factory where the same pair goes on twenty different heads in a morning. It is rated IPX-2 against light rain where the BT-300 has no rating at all, its storage is embedded rather than a card a visitor could remove, and Epson shipped Moverio Admin management software with an optional dock charging five units at once. Same 69-gram optics module, but 119 grams by the time the shared-use body is around it.

This is the half of the pair actually built for deployment. Epson Moverio Admin handles a fleet, the optional dock charges five devices, the embedded storage cannot be pulled out by a visitor, and the IPX-2 rating means light rain is not an incident. It cost 1,399 dollars against the BT-300's 779, and Epson also sold a separate BT-350 ANSI Z87.1 Edition at 1,199 with indoor and outdoor safety shields meeting that standard - the same hardware in certified eyewear, which is what a site requiring safety glasses needs. All three are marked discontinued on Epson's own store today.

Still not a training device in our sense - 23 degrees at 30 Hz shows text and telemetry, not a scene, and our courses are VR builds. But of everything in the Moverio line this is the one that understood shared use, and the ANSI edition understood safety compliance, which is more than most AR glasses manage even now. It is discontinued; for current hardware with the same intent look at the BT-45CS in this catalogue.

How it compares within its class

The axis runs from the lowest to the highest published figure among the AR — industrial devices in this catalogue. The grey tick is the median of that class.

Field of view23°
17°40°

Median for this class: 24°, from 14 models that publish the figure.

Weight119 g
68 g550 g

Median for this class: 188 g, from 14 models that publish the figure.

Battery360 min
120 min600 min

Median for this class: 480 min, from 12 models that publish the figure.

Launch price$1399
$999$6000

Median for this class: $1499, from 11 models that publish the figure.

Controllers and hand tracking

Operated by Touchpad on the temple.

Bare hands

No hand tracking.

Full specification

An em dash means the manufacturer does not publish that figure.

ManufacturerWho makes it — and who you buy support from.
Epson
CategoryWhich kind of product this is. It decides which rows below make sense at all.
AR — industrial
Device typeWhere the computing happens, and therefore what you need to run it.
Standalone AR
AnnouncedThe day it was shown, which is not the day it shipped.
2017-05-31
ReleasedYear the model went on sale. Older is not automatically worse in this category.
2017
AvailabilityWhether you can still order it new today.
Discontinued
Support endsThe date the manufacturer stops supporting it. Decisive for a fleet you are about to buy.
2021-03-31

DisplayHow the image is produced. "No display" is a real answer in this category, not a gap.
Waveguide
Eyes coveredOne eye or both. Over a full shift this is a real difference in fatigue.
Both eyes
Resolution per eyePixels delivered to each eye. Higher means small text and labels stay readable.
1280x720
Refresh rateImages per second. Higher feels smoother and helps people prone to motion discomfort.
30 Hz
Field of viewHow much of your view the image covers. Bigger is more immersive, not automatically better for work.
23° diagonal
Pixel densityPixels per degree of view — the honest way to compare sharpness between a headset and a pair of glasses. Higher is sharper. Only shown where somebody published it; we never compute it ourselves.
Pixel density: not published by the manufacturer
BrightnessIn a plant or outdoors, brightness decides legibility more than resolution does.
Brightness: not published by the manufacturer
WeightThe device alone. Anything above roughly 150 g is felt within an hour.
119 g

Who this device is for

Museums, visitor centres and industrial sites that hand the same glasses to a stream of people and need to manage them centrally. The ANSI Z87.1 edition extended that to sites where safety eyewear is mandatory. Today, an operator maintaining an existing installation.

What is missing, and what the manufacturer does not publish

Epson publishes no brightness figure for this generation, and no end-of-support date could be obtained because its technical site blocks automated access. Only the water rating is documented - IPX-2 for both the headset and the controller in its casing. Note that a separate BT-350 ANSI Z87.1 Edition exists at its own model code and price, and that Epson also sold a BT-300 Drone FPV Edition; neither has its own record here, because both are the same electronics in different eyewear rather than different hardware.

Epson Moverio BT-350 — frequently asked questions

Is the BT-350 ANSI edition a different device?
No, it is the same BT-350 in certified safety eyewear. Epson describes it as designed to be worn in environments that require safety glasses, with indoor and outdoor safety shields that meet ANSI Z87.1 requirements, and sold it at 1,199 dollars under its own model code. Because the electronics are identical we do not give it a separate record - but if your site mandates safety eyewear, that edition is the one to source, and the standard BT-350 will not satisfy the requirement.
Why does the BT-350 weigh so much more than the BT-300?
Because the difference between them is entirely body. The optics and electronics are the same, and Epson says so; the BT-350 adds extendable temples, adjustable nose pads and a casing rated IPX-2, all of which exist so the same pair can be fitted to one head after another and survive being handled all day. That takes it from 69 grams to 119. For a device worn for twenty minutes at a time by a visitor, that trade is the right way round.

Compare this device

Consider these too

The nearest devices in the same class, ranked by availability and launch price — not by our opinion of them.

Specifications checked against the manufacturer's page on 2026-08-17. Manufacturer's specification

Product and company names used here are the trademarks of their respective owners and appear only to identify the hardware being compared. We are not affiliated with, sponsored by or endorsed by any of these manufacturers. Illustrations are our own.