Skillsive
Back to the comparison
Brilliant Labs Halo

Brilliant Labs · 2025 · Phone-powered AR

Brilliant Labs Halo

Open-source AI glasses with a hardware manual most makers would never print.

Display
Micro-OLED, one eye
Brightness
5000 nits
Weight
Field of view
Battery
840 min
Runs Skillsive apps
No

Brilliant Labs Halo — specification and verdict

Halo replaces the Frame, which Brilliant Labs no longer sells, and it is the most documented device in this catalogue: the hardware manual names every component down to the part number, which is why so many rows here are filled where comparable AI glasses are blank. A colour micro-OLED sits above one eye, a VGA global-shutter camera faces forward, and two bone-conduction speakers and two microphones feed a conversational agent on the phone. The silicon is a microcontroller, not a phone SoC — an Arm Cortex-M55 with a small NPU, 2 MB of RAM and 1.8 MB of flash — because the glasses are a Bluetooth peripheral rather than a computer. There is no Wi-Fi, and Brilliant says that is deliberate.

Halo is an open platform, which is unusual here, but the platform is a Bluetooth peripheral rather than a computer: applications live on a phone or a PC and drive the glasses through Brilliant’s SDK, with Python, Flutter and Web Bluetooth targets. That is a real route for a bespoke tool — a checklist, a prompt, a capture trigger — and it is more open than anything else in this class. What does not exist is the rest of a deployment: no fleet management, no provisioning, no enterprise licensing, and support is a community channel plus an email address. The daily AI usage caps are also unquantified, which matters if a device is meant to run all shift.

The most transparent device in this catalogue, and the one whose specification you can actually check: the hardware manual names every component with its part number. That transparency cuts both ways — it is also how you learn that the compute is a microcontroller with 2 MB of RAM, that the display FOV is simply not published, and that the only certification is FCC Part 15, with no CE or UKCA mark for a European buyer. Frame, its predecessor, is gone from the store entirely. Buy it to build something small and specific, not to deploy a fleet.

How it compares within its class

The axis runs from the lowest to the highest published figure among the AI glasses devices in this catalogue. The grey tick is the median of that class.

Battery840 min
240 min2880 min

Median for this class: 540 min, from 10 models that publish the figure.

Brightness5000 nits
1200 nits5000 nits

Median for this class: 1500 nits, from 7 models that publish the figure.

Launch price$399
$299$799

Median for this class: $499, from 14 models that publish the figure.

Full specification

An em dash means the manufacturer does not publish that figure.

ManufacturerWho makes it — and who you buy support from.
Brilliant Labs
CategoryWhich kind of product this is. It decides which rows below make sense at all.
AI glasses
Device typeWhere the computing happens, and therefore what you need to run it.
Phone-powered AR
AnnouncedThe day it was shown, which is not the day it shipped.
2025-07-31
ReleasedYear the model went on sale. Older is not automatically worse in this category.
2025
AvailabilityWhether you can still order it new today.
On sale
Support endsThe date the manufacturer stops supporting it. Decisive for a fleet you are about to buy.
Support ends: not published by the manufacturer

DisplayHow the image is produced. "No display" is a real answer in this category, not a gap.
Micro-OLED, one eye
Eyes coveredOne eye or both. Over a full shift this is a real difference in fatigue.
One eye
Resolution per eyePixels delivered to each eye. Higher means small text and labels stay readable.
640x480
Refresh rateImages per second. Higher feels smoother and helps people prone to motion discomfort.
Refresh rate: not published by the manufacturer
Field of viewHow much of your view the image covers. Bigger is more immersive, not automatically better for work.
Field of view: not published by the manufacturer
Pixel densityPixels per degree of view — the honest way to compare sharpness between a headset and a pair of glasses. Higher is sharper. Only shown where somebody published it; we never compute it ourselves.
Pixel density: not published by the manufacturer
BrightnessIn a plant or outdoors, brightness decides legibility more than resolution does.
5000 nits
WeightThe device alone. Anything above roughly 150 g is felt within an hour.
Weight: not published by the manufacturer

Who this device is for

For developers and for people who want an assistant that remembers what they saw, and who are willing to trade polish for openness. Brilliant Labs describes it as “open source AI glasses for the curious, creative, and forward thinking”, and splits the audience itself: ordinary wearers get memory and dialogue about what they see and hear, while developers get a hardware and software platform to build on. It is a Bluetooth peripheral to a phone rather than a standalone computer, and the specification reflects that honestly.

How it differs from its predecessor

Against its own predecessor, the Frame, it gains a second microphone, two bone-conduction speakers it never had, an NPU in place of an FPGA, and a bigger battery — while losing Frame’s powered charging dock and, deliberately, camera resolution. Brilliant says why: it rejected “hefty image sensors geared more for social media capture than focused AI inference”. Against the Meta Ray-Ban Display or Even Realities G2 it is far more open and far less finished, with no fleet story and no European conformity marking.

What is missing, and what the manufacturer does not publish

No display field of view is published at all, which is conspicuous because Brilliant did publish one for the Frame. There is no IP rating, no CE and no UKCA marking — only FCC Part 15 — which is a genuine problem for a European buyer. No dimensions and no frame material are given. The company also contradicts itself on whether the firmware source is actually public: the product page says the code is on GitHub while the hardware manual’s own link says “coming soon”. Free AI usage is described as having daily caps that are never quantified, and there is no fleet management or enterprise licensing of any kind.

Brilliant Labs Halo — frequently asked questions

Why does the memory figure look so small next to other AI glasses?
Because it is a microcontroller, not a phone chip. Brilliant publishes 2 megabytes of RAM and 1.8 megabytes of flash — megabytes, not gigabytes — around an Arm Cortex-M55 with a small neural unit. The heavy work happens on the phone the glasses pair with. Our table leaves those fields empty rather than printing a figure that would read a thousand times too high in gigabytes.
Can a company build its own application for Halo?
Yes, and that is the point of it. There is a published SDK with Python, Flutter and Web Bluetooth targets, and applications live on the host and drive the glasses over Bluetooth rather than being installed on them. What does not exist is anything around a deployment — no device management, no provisioning, no enterprise support tier — so this is a route to a prototype or a single-purpose tool, not to a fleet.

Compare this device

Consider these too

The nearest devices in the same class, ranked by availability and launch price — not by our opinion of them.

Specifications checked against the manufacturer's page on 2026-08-16. Manufacturer's specification

Product and company names used here are the trademarks of their respective owners and appear only to identify the hardware being compared. We are not affiliated with, sponsored by or endorsed by any of these manufacturers. Illustrations are our own.